Premio Rotary Club L’Aquila Gran Sasso

  • Home
  • News
  • Premio Rotary Club L’Aquila Gran Sasso
  • 22 May 2026
  • Published in
  • 0

Il Rotary Club L’Aquila Gran Sasso, con moderatore l’Avv. Pierluigi Daniele, nonchè presidente della Commissione “Premio delle Scienze e delle Arti Giovanni Battista Bruno” e Past President del Rotary Club, ha presentato il 17° premio “Giovanni Battista Bruno”, istituito dal Club rotariano L’Aquila Gran Sasso, con tema “La ricerca in condizioni estreme: dai laboratori sotterranei del Gran Sasso agli esperimenti nello Spazio” previsto nel convegno del 6 Giugno  2026.

 

Below are the main newspapers reporting on the event:

https://www.abruzzodaily.it/news/citta/laquila/laquila-in-mostra-le-eccellenze-per-la-cultura-e-ladivulgazione-scientifica/6266#google_vignette

Rotary Gran Sasso e talenti: L’Aquila premia il futuro

Premio Bruno, Rotary e Infn-Lngs valorizzano la ricerca dei giovani

https://www.assergiracconta.it/archivioNews.php?page=1&id=38427

https://www.initaly.it/it/articolo/laquila-il-premio-giovanni-battista-bruno-celebra-le-eccellenze-16183

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

Related Posts

  • 2 July 2026
  • 0
  • 269

medical expenses in

Private medical expenses are covered by the Region of residence. This occurs whenever we book a service through the National Health System (NHS) using a ticket.
Read more
  • 19 February 2025
  • 0
  • 7210

The Public Administration cannot…

Attorney Pierluigi Daniele has obtained three important rulings at the Council of State (three twin rulings), on the subject of noise emissions in residential environments. In detail, the jurisdiction of the Administrative Judge has been established when the matter is complex due to the presence of a provision of the Public Administration that is flawed due to mismanagement or violation of multiple environmental-landscape-urban planning regulations. Above all, what is of notable novelty in the issue discussed is that the provision of the Public Administration, legitimate or not, is in any case illegitimate if it violates fundamental-constitutional human rights. In this case, the contested provision allows an economic activity to introduce noise pollution into residential environments, harming the right to health and the living environment. It is the Constitution itself that prohibits, from a perspective of balancing constitutional rights, that economic freedom can harm health or the environment. Therefore, the provision of the Public Administration can only be considered illegitimate and that the jurisdiction, in matters in which there are fundamental or human rights, connected with defects in the administrative provision, is of the Administrative Judge, being the only one in Italy able to evaluate legitimate interests and subjective rights. Below is the link to one of the three twin sentences: https://dirittifondamentali.it/2025/01/31/il-consiglio-di-stato-interviene-in-materia-di-giurisdizione-sui-c-d-diritti-incomprimibili-consiglio-di-stato-sez-v-sentenza-8-gennaio-2025-n-129/
Read more