Law and Bioethics – medically assisted procreation

The expression medically assisted procreation refers to all the methods, whether surgical, hormonal, pharmacological or other, which allow individuals to be helped to procreate. These methods include assisted fertilization, a procreative technique consisting in the in vitro fertilization of the egg by the spermatozoon. This technique differs from in vivo fertilization where the meeting of the gametes takes place inside the human body. The Italian legislator has published the law that regulates medically assisted procreation, setting limits to the same as for heterologous fertilization. Limit and prohibition on heterologous fertilization lapsed following various rulings of the Constitutional Court which expressed the unconstitutionality of the law due to infringement of inviolable rights such as: freedom of self-determination and right to health. In favor of couples who make use of medically assisted procreation, the Italian State, in application of constitutional rights, bioethics and human rights, has expanded the possibility of accessing this form of conception, reducing the cases of exclusion.

0

Related Posts

medical expenses in

Private medical expenses are covered by the Region of residence. This occurs whenever we book a service through the National Health System (NHS) using a ticket.
Read more

Rotary Club L'Aquila Award

The Rotary Club of L'Aquila Gran Sasso, moderated by Attorney Pierluigi Daniele, president of the "Giovanni Battista Bruno Science and Arts Award" Committee and past president of the Rotary Club,…
Read more

The Public Administration cannot…

Attorney Pierluigi Daniele has obtained three important rulings at the Council of State (three twin rulings), on the subject of noise emissions in residential environments. In detail, the jurisdiction of the Administrative Judge has been established when the matter is complex due to the presence of a provision of the Public Administration that is flawed due to mismanagement or violation of multiple environmental-landscape-urban planning regulations. Above all, what is of notable novelty in the issue discussed is that the provision of the Public Administration, legitimate or not, is in any case illegitimate if it violates fundamental-constitutional human rights. In this case, the contested provision allows an economic activity to introduce noise pollution into residential environments, harming the right to health and the living environment. It is the Constitution itself that prohibits, from a perspective of balancing constitutional rights, that economic freedom can harm health or the environment. Therefore, the provision of the Public Administration can only be considered illegitimate and that the jurisdiction, in matters in which there are fundamental or human rights, connected with defects in the administrative provision, is of the Administrative Judge, being the only one in Italy able to evaluate legitimate interests and subjective rights. Below is the link to one of the three twin sentences: https://dirittifondamentali.it/2025/01/31/il-consiglio-di-stato-interviene-in-materia-di-giurisdizione-sui-c-d-diritti-incomprimibili-consiglio-di-stato-sez-v-sentenza-8-gennaio-2025-n-129/
Read more